Considering your work in the last three chapters, what remedies are available to your firm under U.S. law that would help protect its U.S. market? What are the available remedies that the U.S. government has to help improve market access to your customers who manufacture robots in Asia? What factors (economic, political, or other) will affect the outcome of the case? How might these legal implications affect your global business strategy? Discuss. 

The argument of this case shows that the US government has to help the market through the economic effect of the use of robots has focused on the effects in Asian countries. Idealists state that any opposing possessions will be short-lived and that robots may support stunned slowdowns in efficiency growth and escalate worker income and well-being (Schaffer, Agusti, & Dhooge, 2015). Worriers point to the quick pace and growing opportunity of new technological advances, and government that, due to their remembrance, robots may need only a small number of improved skilled workers for their process, relatively than the constraint for large numbers of low skilled employees that completed previously technical advances such as the steam engine.

Though, economy-wide properties are slight. The relaxed pace of restoring may partly be clarified by desultory investment and inactive aggregate demand more normally. In addition, developed states now lack the supplier systems that some Asian countries have constructed to complement meeting activities. Lastly, offshoring endures to take place, and while labor-cost disparities remain a factor in the decision of firms on where to discover production, particularly of goods with a high labor satisfied, demand factors such as the size and growth of local marketplaces are attractive increasingly significant determinants (Schaffer, Agusti, & Dhooge, 2015). This elaborates that the making of labor-intensive manufactures designed for quickly growing markets in great developing countries that have domestic making connections is unlikely to be restored. The indication also shows, however, that where restoring to Asian countries has happened, it has dropped short of probable reindustrialization belongings. Efficiency differences may arise because some firms choose to yield in more technology-intensive methods, for example by arranging more robots than other businesses. This may make them adequately reasonable to begin transferring. Such effects may be protected by combining robotize with other new automation machineries, such as three-dimensional printing.