Do you feel that countries should limit the influence of foreign cultures in their communities? How should they do that? Do you think that a country should restrict the foreign content of advertising, television, music, or film?

Limiting influence of foreign cultures

I feel that countries should not limit the influence of foreign cultures in their communities instead countries should understand and appreciate many cultures and also establish relationships with people having different cultures other than their own. And the countries should build a strong alliance with diverse cultural groups. Moreover the interaction patterns of individuals who have experience with culturally determined behavior and practice working in foreign languages, cultural differences incline to become less important. Individuals, who are experienced culturally determined behavior in interactions, are able to identify the applicable cultural characteristics and as a result know how to adjust to them. They will selected substitute forms of behavior, depending on the achievement of preceding actions. As a consequence a weak situation is turned into a strong condition (Tomlinson, 1991).

In order to build countries those are powerful enough to attain significant change than countries should have large numbers of people working together. And cultural groups that join forces, then they will be more active in reaching common objectives. Each cultural group has exclusive strengths and perceptions that the greater community can advantage from. Countries need an extensive range of ideas, customs, and wisdom to explain problems and improve community life. Receiving non-mainstream collections into the focus of native activity can deliver fresh perceptions and shed new light on tough difficulties. Moreover in order to understand the cultures that will help others to overcome and avoid cultural and ethnic divisions. Racial and ethnic dissections result in mistakes, loss of opportunities, and sometimes violence. Racial and ethnic encounters drain societies of financial and social properties and they confuse cultural groups from influential the important issues they have in common. Persons from dissimilar cultures have to be covered in decision-making events in order for programs or policies to be active. This above experience provides persons with a preview of the work life that is to monitor and leads experience, guidelines and enhances connections in the work setting, and also delivers the ground instructions under which everyday conduct is to be achieved.
This suggests that administrative socialization indicates to positive outcomes for workers and this will decreases role haziness and avoids role conflict. It means that for diverse people the cultural value of their own is very much valuable than to put a price tag on and no destruction can be considered creative. Traditional applies, tongues, and practices of arts are fading, and once misplaced they are tough to retrieve. This shows that on the one hand the complexity of the issues that arise that the cultural diversity is to be addressed and on the other hand, in a political context, the starkly different sensibilities and motivation of the parties when drafting legally binding instrument on the different cultural matters (Tomlinson, 1991).