The Best Interest of the Child
In the juvenile court system, the “best interests of the child” is the paramount consideration. Traditionally the court has focused on maintaining a family together when feasible, and also in the best interests of the child/children. These children have all been removed from their home at present. At this point, the oldest child remains with his father/step-mother (the Steeles). The 3 younger children, originally also with the Steeles (who are not their biological parents) now live with grandparents.
Despite the fact that there is no standard meaning of “best interests of the child,” the term usually relates to the consideration that courts consider when choosing what kind of administrations, activities, and requests will best serve a child and in addition who is best suited to deal with a child (Children Bureau, 2016). “Best interests” judgments are for the most part made by considering various variables identified with the conditions of the child and the conditions of the parents as well as guardian along with the ability of a parent, with the definitive wellbeing and prosperity of the child (Christian, 2009).
There are many reasonable efforts that can be implemented by the social agencies of the state that plan to offer the help and administrations expected to protect and reunify families (Children Bureau, 2016). The programs related to the community services can be offered for promoting the wellbeing and prosperity of children and families. These administrations are intended to not just build the confidence and quality of the family, yet additionally upgrade the capability and certainty of the parents (Children Bureau, 2016). Also, minimal monetary help and endowments for the family can encourage individuals like Christenson and Wilde to manage the cost for offering shelter, safety and stability for children and supporting family alongside improvement of child development.
The conditions would only be supporting after a proper counseling program for the parents of these kids as well as supervising them for some specific time for making sure that there would be more supportive and healthy environment for children as well as their parents (Christian, 2009). Social agencies can be conducted to offer financial aid to the family on monthly basis to manage the situation they faced before.
Substance abuse counseling is likewise a legitimate motivational program for the parents to make them responsible and strong parents for raising their children. The court and children agency would just be the contact point to reunify the family under the previously mentioned strategies and conditions. Furthermore, policymakers in a few states are required to join help with child rearing and family life into thorough programs for reentering a home or place of living (Christian, 2009).
Many firms are expected to team up in for reunifying the family. To lay the preparation for such joint effort, a policy maker or legislator should think about the connection between a detained parent and his or her child ought to be perceived, preserved, identified and reinforced when in the best interest of the child. For example, in this case the integrated institutes need to analyze the Christenson and Wilde underlying considerations for their children and their approach to reunify the family in a healthy way and additionally, kids also should be counseled especially of ages 9, 4 and 2 years to better understand the family interactions and healthy environment and their consent to live with their parents again. Through the proper planning, the family can be reunited but in better interests of the children development and life.